Forum

Advanced Search

OTF, @font-face, Cufon, sIFR, etc. and the future of Typography on the web.

 
 
Avatar
Total Posts: 2

Love the site guys! I have always loved typography & typeface design. I used to watch my dad lay out advertisements using rub-on lettering and hand-drawn typefaces. It’s so fascinating and it really is a science.

Anyway, I thought I’d get some conversation going that has been really interesting me lately. I’ve used all sorts text-replacement methods in different sites, some frameworks (flash+js), some just standard css/image replacement. I’ve also played with @font-face recently, using free OTF fonts that allow @font-face redistribution in their license.

What’s your favorite font-replacement method on the web?

I think that it makes sense that we pursue ways to display beautiful typefaces to other people on the web. It seems as though the print world is becoming smaller, and the there are less people appreciating the amazing craftsmanship of typeface designers on an everyday basis. There is something to be said about the subtleties of a nice serif on the pages of a paper book or a magazine or a newspaper, than the standard “Helvetica”, “Arial” or “Lucida Grande” that we are all so familiar with in our lives.

Sharing fonts with @font-face, etc. has come under some scrutiny and many heated debates due to that fact that you are basically giving away fonts that may not have the license for it. I have heard some complaining on both ends, but I haven’t really heard and discussions about solving this question…

How do we continue to provide an audience for typeface designers and their work in the digital age, while upholding their ability to make a living?

Avatar
Total Posts: 1

I dont know the answer to the licence issue. Clearly there is a need to protect the industry, as without it well…..we know.

It would be nice to hear more noise on solving the issue, and this would seem to be a fitting place to turn up the volume.

For me, a start would be a registration database for font licences that can verify a sites legitimacy in using it. I know this wont stop theft, but if its easy to verify a licence against a site, then the illegal down loaders will be limited in their usage of their loot, as using it on their site would be as verifiable, and employing tough penalties in the way of fines or removal of sites for persistent offenders could act as a deterrent.

I dont think anyone seriously thinks theft of digital property will ever be completely stamped out on the web, but creating a culture that makes designers who steal fonts akin to designers that steal designs would be a start. Add to that the threat of site removal and financial penalties and we have enough to get @font-face out of the box for good.

Just my 2p

Avatar
Total Posts: 1

My main priority is accurate visual rendering, and fast rendering time. Cufon has been the most reliable option so far. @font-face has some serious rendering issues on Windows. sIRF is too slow. Typekit and similar feel like I lose control over the fonts for some reason, not to mention the pricing issue.

So yeah, Cufon for now.

Avatar
Total Posts: 21

I’m late to this conversation, but I’ve written about these issues so I thought I’d share some links.

Licensing:
Where to get web fonts - October 20, 2009
WOFF, the web standard for type - September 13, 2009
Type sellers, web fonts, and Typekit - July 19, 2009

@font-face technique:
How to use CSS @font-face - October 30, 2009
Nice Web Type likes Bello and Proxima Nova - July 24, 2009
Nice Web Type likes Museo and Sans - July 9, 2009
Nice Web Type likes Graublau Sans with Lucida sanserif - May 22, 2009